Step 1 of 5
CPQDash — Brandauer Preview

Configure. Price. Quote.
In minutes, not days.

This is a five-step walkthrough configured for precision metal stamping — showing what a CPQ system looks like when it is built around your products, your materials, and your margins.

No spreadsheets. No email chains. No waiting.
Configured for your components, tolerances, and volume tiers.
Live in days — not a nine-month implementation project.
About CPQDash
// Quote Pipeline — Live View
CPQ-0041 Automotive Tier 1 £84,200 Approval
CPQ-0040 EV Lamination OEM £127,500 Sent
CPQ-0039 Medical Device Co. £34,800 Won
CPQ-0038 Defence Contractor £216,000 Sent

What quoting looks like
without a CPQ system.

This is not a criticism. It is an accurate description of how most precision manufacturers quote today — and why it costs them time, margin, and orders.

📧

The Email Tennis Problem

An enquiry arrives. It goes to an estimator. The estimator emails engineering for material costs. Engineering replies two days later. A spreadsheet gets built and emailed to the customer. The customer replies with changes. The process restarts. Every change is a new thread.

// Avg. quote turnaround: 3–7 days
📊

The Spreadsheet Configuration Problem

Every estimator works from their own version of the quoting spreadsheet. Pricing logic lives in individuals' heads, not in the system. Complex configurations — material grade, press tonnage, tolerance band, volume break — require expertise to price correctly. That expertise is not transferable.

// Pricing knowledge: not in any system
📉

The Pipeline Visibility Problem

The CEO wants to know where the pipeline stands. The answer requires someone to compile data from multiple estimators, chase email threads, and estimate close probabilities from memory. By the time the picture is assembled, it is already out of date.

// Pipeline view: always 48–72 hrs behind
⏱️

The Speed-to-Quote Problem

In precision stamping, the manufacturer who responds fastest has a measurable commercial advantage. While your team is building a spreadsheet, a competitor with a faster process is already in the customer's inbox. Manual quoting makes speed structurally impossible to achieve consistently.

// First quote wins: 67% of the time

CPQDash replaces the email chains, the spreadsheet versions, and the invisible pipeline — with a single configured system your estimators, operations team, and CEO see in real time.

CPQDash — configured for precision stamping.

What your estimators see. Guided configuration. Live pricing. Approval workflow. Every quote tracked from intake to close.

→ What you are looking at The CPQDash estimator interface, pre-configured with Brandauer product logic: material grades, press capacity tiers, tolerance standards, and volume pricing. An estimator completes guided fields. The system calculates the quote. No spreadsheet required.
CPQ
CPQDash
// Brandauer — Estimator View
Quoting
📋 Quote Pipeline 12
➕ New Quote
✅ Approval Queue 3
Intelligence
⚙️ Configurator
💰 Pricing Rules
📈 Win / Loss
Operations
🏭 Capacity View
📄 Documents
Quote Pipeline
All estimators — real time
Active Quotes
12
↑ 3 this week
Pipeline Value
£1.2M
↑ £180k vs last month
Avg. Quote Time
47m
↓ from 4.2 days
Win Rate
68%
↑ 22pts since CPQ live
Ref Customer Component Value Status Days Open
CPQ-2026-0041 Automotive Tier 1 Stamped bracket — 1.5mm 304SS £84,200 Approval 1
CPQ-2026-0040 EV Lamination OEM Electrical steel lamination stack £127,500 Sent 3
CPQ-2026-0039 Medical Device Co. 316L micro-stamped housing £34,800 Won 2
CPQ-2026-0038 Defence Contractor Progressive tool — titanium clip £216,000 Sent 5

Everything the CEO needs.
Nothing they don't.

The same data as the estimator view. A different lens. Real-time pipeline, win rates, and commercial performance — without opening a single spreadsheet.

→ What changes between the Estimator View and the CEO View Role-based access determines what each user sees on login. An estimator sees their quotes and workflow. The CEO sees commercial performance across all estimators, all quotes, and all sectors — in a single screen.
CEO
CEO View — CPQDash
// R. Crozier — Brandauer
Good morning, Rowan.
// Monday 24 February 2026 — Pipeline at a glance
Total Pipeline
£1.2M
↑ £180k vs last month
Quotes This Month
28
↑ 9 vs same period
Win Rate
68%
↑ 22pts since CPQ live
Avg. Quote Time
47m
↓ from 4.2 days
Pipeline by Sector
Automotive / EV£487,000
Defence & Aerospace£334,500
Medical Devices£198,200
Electronics / Telecom£142,800
Other£37,500
Win Rate by Estimator
J. Hartley74%
M. Chen68%
S. Patel61%
R. Sherwood71%

The difference CPQ makes —
in plain numbers.

A direct comparison between your current quoting process and a configured CPQDash deployment. No sales language. Just the delta.

Area Current State With CPQDash RAG
Quote Turnaround 3–7 days. Email and spreadsheet cycle, dependent on who is available. Under 60 minutes. Guided configuration produces a complete, priced quote. G
Pricing Consistency Estimator-dependent. Rules exist in people's heads, not the system. Pricing logic locked in the configurator. Same rules applied every time. G
CEO Pipeline Visibility Compiled manually. Always 48–72 hours behind. Requires someone's time to produce. Real time. One screen. No chasing, no compiling, no waiting. G
Knowledge Retention Pricing logic and configuration expertise leaves when estimators leave. Captured in the system permanently. Institutional knowledge that stays. G
New Estimator Ramp Months of shadowing experienced estimators. High error risk throughout. Guided by the system from day one. Guardrails prevent underpricing. A
Speed to Deployment Enterprise CPQ alternatives: 6–18 months, £150k–£500k investment. CPQDash configured and live in days, not months. G
ERP / CRM Integration Not applicable to current spreadsheet-based process. Not required to go live. Available as a phased next step when needed. A

This was built for Brandauer.

What you have seen is a starting point configured for precision metal stamping. The meeting is the conversation about what gets modified, what gets added, and what a Brandauer-specific deployment looks like in practice.

Questions before the meeting? [email protected]
Robert Haigh Sent ahead of our conversation — so we spend the meeting on what matters, not on introductions.